Fisher, D. and Frey, N. (2011). The Formative Assessment Action Plan: Practical Steps to More Successful Teaching and Learning
Miller, M. D. (2016). Minds Online: Teaching Effectively with Technology
Mezeske, B. A. and Mezeske, R.J. (2007). Beyond tests and quizzes : creative assessments in the college classroom San Francisco : Jossey-Bass. Call No. LB2368 .B49 2007
Wylie, E. C. (2012). Improving formative assessment practice to empower student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA. : Corwin Press. Call No. LB2822.75 .I52 2012
Bell, M. C., Simone, P. M., & Whitfield, L. C. (2016). Evaluation of 'outofthebox' textbook technology supplements on student learning. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(2), 112124. doi:10.1037/stl0000057
Carter, D., & Crichton, S. (2014). Empowering twenty-first century assessment practices: Designing technologies as agents of change. Educational Media International, 51(4), 295309. doi:10.1080/09523987.2014.977007 .
Gleason, J. (2012). Using technologyassisted instruction and assessment to reduce the effect of class size on student outcomes in undergraduate Mathematics courses. College Teaching, 60(3), 8794.
Juniu, S. (2006). Use of technology for constructivist learning in a performance assessment class. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10(1), 6779. doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee1001_5
Lawrie, G. A., Matthews, K. E., Bailey, C., Kavanagh, L. J., Gahan, L. R., Weaver, G. C., & ... Taylor, M. (2014). Technology supported facilitation and assessment of small group collaborative inquiry learning in large first-year classes. Journal of Learning Design, 7(2), 121.
Mostert, M., & Snowball, J. D. (2013). Where angels fear to tread: Online peer assessment in a large first-year class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 674686. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.683770
Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 29-41.
Reardon, K. A. (2015). Computerized writing assessment technology: Business law students weigh in on its use in the college classroom for developing workplace ready writing. Computers and Composition, 38(Part A), 3244. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.005.
Schlegel, E. M., & Selfridge, N. J. (2014). Fun, collaboration and formative assessment: Skinquizition, a class wide gaming competition in a medical school with a large class. Medical Teacher, 36(5), 447449. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.888409
This is a reminder that while there is not a prohibition on the use of Google Apps/programs by IUP faculty, Google has consistently been unwilling to agree to the Commonwealth's terms and conditions. Therefore, when a student or faculty member agrees to a 'click through I agree' with Google, it is doing so as an individual and not binding IUP to those terms. The advice IT has received from PASSHE legal is that the faculty member could take personal liability if - for instance - a FERPA violation would occur using these tools. As a result, IT Services does not support Google usage and users are basically 'on their own' when they choose to use it. There is no intent to either create conflict or infringe on faculty academic freedom. This is for informational purposes to serve strictly as a caution.
For more information, please visit the IUP website: http://www.iup.edu/itsupportcenter/about/policies/guidelines/end-user-license-agreements/